1. Conduid
  2. Developer Tools
  3. Actor Critic Thinking
MCP server · Developer Tools

Actor Critic Thinking

A dual-perspective thinking analysis server based on Model Context Protocol (MCP), providing comprehensive performance evaluation through Actor-Critic methodology.

Unclaimed MIT last commit a year ago thinkingaimcpactor-critic
54Fair

Scored 5 months ago · breakdown

About Actor Critic Thinking

Actor Critic Thinking is an MCP server published by aquarius-wing in the Developer Tools category: a dual-perspective thinking analysis server based on Model Context Protocol (MCP), providing comprehensive performance evaluation through Actor-Critic methodology.

The repository has 32 stars and 8 forks, with the last commit a year ago. Six months or more without a commit doesn't mean the server is broken, but check the open issues before depending on it in production.

Install

From source
git clone https://github.com/aquarius-wing/actor-critic-thinking-mcp

This server has no ConduID identity, so agent calls to it are not receipted. Pin the version you install and review the source before granting it credentials.

Ask AI

✦

Ask AI about Actor Critic Thinking

Powered by Claude · Grounded in docs

I know everything about Actor Critic Thinking. Ask me about installation, configuration, usage, or troubleshooting.

Security checks

Static checks derived from the repository 8 hours ago. Heuristics on the source, not an audit.

  • ✓README presentThe repository ships documentation.
  • ✓License declaredUsable under a stated license.
  • !Tests presentNo tests found. Behaviour changes may go unnoticed between versions.
  • ✓Dependencies pinnedA lockfile pins dependency versions.
  • ✓No dynamic code executionSource scan found no eval, dynamic Function, or shell execution.
  • !Scoped permissionsDoesn't declare a permission scope. Assume it can do anything its process can.

README

Actor-Critic Thinking MCP Server

A dual-perspective thinking analysis server based on Model Context Protocol (MCP), providing comprehensive performance evaluation through Actor-Critic methodology.

Showcase

demo1-with-thinking.png

Without Actor-Critic Thinking

demo1-without-thinking.png

Features

  • Dual-perspective Analysis: Alternates between actor (creator/performer) and critic (analyzer/evaluator) perspectives
  • Round Tracking: Tracks rounds of dual-perspective analysis
  • Balanced Assessment: Combines empathetic understanding with objective analysis
  • Multi-dimensional Evaluation: Generates nuanced, multi-dimensional assessments
  • Actionable Feedback: Provides constructive improvement suggestions

Use Cases

  • Evaluating artistic performances, creative works, or strategic decisions
  • Analyzing the gap between intention and execution
  • Providing constructive feedback that considers both creative vision and technical execution
  • Reviewing complex scenarios that require both empathy and objectivity
  • Situations requiring balanced assessment of subjective and objective criteria
  • Performance reviews that need both self-reflection and external evaluation
  • Creative processes that benefit from iterative refinement

Parameters

Required Parameters

  • content (string): Current analysis content from the specified role perspective
  • role (string): Perspective role, options:
    • "actor": Actor perspective (empathetic/creative viewpoint)
    • "critic": Critic perspective (analytical/evaluative viewpoint)
  • nextRoundNeeded (boolean): Whether another round of actor-critic dialogue is needed
  • thoughtNumber (integer): Current thought number in the sequence (minimum: 1)
  • totalThoughts (integer): Total number of thoughts planned (must be odd and >= 3)

Role Perspective Guidelines

Actor perspective should include:

  • Understanding intentions, creative choices, emotional context, challenges faced
  • Self-reflection on performance and decision-making process
  • Explanation of creative vision and goals

Critic perspective should include:

  • Technical execution analysis, effectiveness evaluation
  • Audience impact assessment, comparative analysis
  • Objective feedback and improvement suggestions

How to use

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actor-critic-thinking": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-server-actor-critic-thinking"]
    }
  }
}

Installation and Running

# Build the project
npm run build

# Run the server
node dist/index.js

Example Usage

System prompt:

Your task is to generate creative, memorable, and marketable product names based on the provided description and keywords. The product names should be concise (2-4 words), evocative, and easily understood by the target audience. Avoid generic or overly literal names. Instead, aim to create a name that stands out, captures the essence of the product, and leaves a lasting impression.

User prompt:

Description: A noise-canceling, wireless, over-ear headphone with a 20-hour battery life and touch controls. Designed for audiophiles and frequent travelers. Keywords: immersive, comfortable, high-fidelity, long-lasting, convenient

Best Practices

  1. Start with either actor or critic perspective
  2. Alternate between perspectives to maintain balance
  3. Continue rounds until comprehensive analysis is achieved
  4. Focus on relevant performance aspects
  5. Generate balanced assessments that honor both perspectives
  6. Provide constructive, actionable feedback
  7. Only set nextRoundNeeded to false when analysis is complete

README fetched from the repository 8 hours ago. The original is authoritative.

Questions

About Actor Critic Thinking

How do I install Actor Critic Thinking?

No package has been published for this server, so install it from source: clone the repository and follow its README.

Is Actor Critic Thinking safe to use with an AI agent?

Its trust score is 54 out of 100 (fair). It passes 4 of the 6 static security checks run so far; the failures are listed above. It has no ConduID identity yet, so agent calls to it are not receipted.

Is Actor Critic Thinking still maintained?

The last commit was a year ago and 4 open issues. That's long enough that you should check whether the maintainer is responding to issues before depending on it.