1. Conduid
  2. Developer Tools
  3. CRASH
MCP server · Developer Tools

CRASH

MCP server for structured and efficient reasoning with step validation, branching, and revisions.

74Good

Scored 3 days ago · breakdown

About CRASH

CRASH is an MCP server published by nikkoxgonzales in the Developer Tools category: mCP server for structured and efficient reasoning with step validation, branching, and revisions. It has been installed 0 times through Conduid.

The repository has 67 stars and 7 forks, with the last commit 9 months ago. Six months or more without a commit doesn't mean the server is broken, but check the open issues (0) before depending on it in production.

Install

Install
npx crash-mcp

This server has no ConduID identity, so agent calls to it are not receipted. Pin the version you install and review the source before granting it credentials.

Ask AI

Ask AI about CRASH

Powered by Claude · Grounded in docs

I know everything about CRASH. Ask me about installation, configuration, usage, or troubleshooting.

Security checks

  • ·README presentNot checked yet.
  • ·License declaredNot checked yet.
  • ·Tests presentNot checked yet.
  • ·Dependencies pinnedNot checked yet.
  • ·No dynamic code executionNot checked yet.
  • !Scoped permissionsDoesn't declare a permission scope. Assume it can do anything its process can.

Releases

v3.0.3v3.0.3 · 17 Dec 2025Full Changelog**: https://github.com/nikkoxgonzales/crash-mcp/compare/v3.0.2...v3.0.3
v3.0.0v3.0.0 · 15 Dec 2025Full Changelog**: https://github.com/nikkoxgonzales/crash-mcp/compare/v2.0.0...v3.0.0

README

CRASH.jpg


CRASH

Cascaded Reasoning with Adaptive Step Handling

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for structured, iterative reasoning. CRASH helps AI assistants break down complex problems into trackable steps with confidence tracking, revision support, and branching for exploring alternatives.

Inspired by MCP Sequential Thinking Server


Why CRASH?

I created this because typing "use sequential_thinking" was cumbersome. Now I can simply say "use crash" instead.

CRASH is more token-efficient than sequential thinking - it doesn't include code in thoughts and has streamlined prompting. It's my go-to solution when an agent can't solve an issue in one shot or when plan mode falls short.

Claude Code's Assessment

CRASH helped significantly for this specific task:

Where CRASH helped:
- Systematic analysis: Forced me to break down the issue methodically
- Solution exploration: Explored multiple approaches before settling on the best one
- Planning validation: Each step built on the previous one logically

The key difference:
CRASH forced me to be more thorough in the analysis phase. Without it, I might have
rushed to implement the first solution rather than exploring cleaner approaches.

Verdict: CRASH adds value for complex problems requiring systematic analysis of
multiple solution paths. For simpler tasks, internal planning is sufficient and faster.

Features

  • Structured reasoning steps - Track thought process, outcomes, and next actions
  • Confidence tracking - Express uncertainty with 0-1 scores, get warnings on low confidence
  • Revision mechanism - Correct previous steps, with original steps marked as revised
  • Branching support - Explore multiple solution paths with depth limits
  • Dependency validation - Declare and validate step dependencies
  • Session management - Group related reasoning chains with automatic timeout cleanup
  • Multiple output formats - Console (colored), JSON, or Markdown
  • Flexible validation - Strict mode for rigid rules, flexible mode for natural language

Installation

npm install crash-mcp

Or use directly with npx:

npx crash-mcp

Quick Setup

Most MCP clients use this JSON configuration:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crash": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "crash-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Configuration by Client

Client Setup Method
Claude Code claude mcp add crash -- npx -y crash-mcp
Cursor Add to ~/.cursor/mcp.json
VS Code Add to settings JSON under mcp.servers
Claude Desktop Add to claude_desktop_config.json
Windsurf Add to MCP config file
JetBrains Settings > Tools > AI Assistant > MCP
Others Use standard MCP JSON config above

Use the cmd wrapper:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crash": {
      "command": "cmd",
      "args": ["/c", "npx", "-y", "crash-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crash": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "crash-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "CRASH_STRICT_MODE": "false",
        "MAX_HISTORY_SIZE": "100",
        "CRASH_OUTPUT_FORMAT": "console",
        "CRASH_SESSION_TIMEOUT": "60",
        "CRASH_MAX_BRANCH_DEPTH": "5"
      }
    }
  }
}
FROM node:18-alpine
WORKDIR /app
RUN npm install -g crash-mcp
CMD ["crash-mcp"]
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "crash": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": ["run", "-i", "--rm", "crash-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

Bun:

{ "command": "bunx", "args": ["-y", "crash-mcp"] }

Deno:

{
  "command": "deno",
  "args": ["run", "--allow-env", "--allow-net", "npm:crash-mcp"]
}

Configuration

Variable Default Description
CRASH_STRICT_MODE false Enable strict validation (requires specific prefixes)
MAX_HISTORY_SIZE 100 Maximum steps to retain in history
CRASH_OUTPUT_FORMAT console Output format: console, json, markdown
CRASH_NO_COLOR false Disable colored console output
CRASH_SESSION_TIMEOUT 60 Session timeout in minutes
CRASH_MAX_BRANCH_DEPTH 5 Maximum branch nesting depth
CRASH_ENABLE_SESSIONS false Enable session management

Usage

Required Parameters

Parameter Type Description
step_number integer Sequential step number (starts at 1)
estimated_total integer Estimated total steps (adjustable)
purpose string Step category: analysis, action, validation, exploration, hypothesis, correction, planning, or custom
context string What's already known to avoid redundancy
thought string Current reasoning process
outcome string Expected or actual result
next_action string/object Next action (simple string or structured with tool details)
rationale string Why this next action was chosen

Optional Parameters

Parameter Type Description
is_final_step boolean Mark as final step to complete reasoning
confidence number Confidence level 0-1 (warnings below 0.5)
uncertainty_notes string Describe doubts or assumptions
revises_step integer Step number being corrected
revision_reason string Why revision is needed
branch_from integer Step to branch from
branch_id string Unique branch identifier
branch_name string Human-readable branch name
dependencies integer[] Step numbers this depends on
session_id string Group related reasoning chains
tools_used string[] Tools used in this step
external_context object External data relevant to step

Examples

Basic Usage

{
  "step_number": 1,
  "estimated_total": 3,
  "purpose": "analysis",
  "context": "User requested optimization of database queries",
  "thought": "I need to first understand the current query patterns before proposing changes",
  "outcome": "Identified slow queries for optimization",
  "next_action": "analyze query execution plans",
  "rationale": "Understanding execution plans will reveal bottlenecks"
}

With Confidence and Final Step

{
  "step_number": 3,
  "estimated_total": 3,
  "purpose": "summary",
  "context": "Analyzed queries and tested index optimizations",
  "thought": "The index on user_id reduced query time from 2s to 50ms",
  "outcome": "Performance issue resolved with new index",
  "next_action": "document the change",
  "rationale": "Team should know about the optimization",
  "confidence": 0.9,
  "is_final_step": true
}

Revision Example

{
  "step_number": 4,
  "estimated_total": 5,
  "purpose": "correction",
  "context": "Previous analysis missed a critical join condition",
  "thought": "The join was causing a cartesian product, not the index",
  "outcome": "Corrected root cause identification",
  "next_action": "fix the join condition",
  "rationale": "This is the actual performance issue",
  "revises_step": 2,
  "revision_reason": "Overlooked critical join in initial analysis"
}

Branching Example

{
  "step_number": 3,
  "estimated_total": 6,
  "purpose": "exploration",
  "context": "Two optimization approaches identified",
  "thought": "Exploring the indexing approach first as it's lower risk",
  "outcome": "Branch created for index optimization testing",
  "next_action": "test index performance",
  "rationale": "This approach has lower risk than query rewrite",
  "branch_from": 2,
  "branch_id": "index-optimization",
  "branch_name": "Index-based optimization"
}

When to Use CRASH

Good fit:

  • Complex multi-step problem solving
  • Code analysis and optimization
  • System design with multiple considerations
  • Debugging requiring systematic investigation
  • Exploring multiple solution paths
  • Tasks where you need to track confidence

Not needed:

  • Simple, single-step tasks
  • Pure information retrieval
  • Deterministic procedures with no uncertainty

Development

npm install        # Install dependencies
npm run build      # Build TypeScript
npm run dev        # Run with MCP inspector
npm start          # Start built server

Troubleshooting

Try using bunx instead of npx:

{ "command": "bunx", "args": ["-y", "crash-mcp"] }

Try the experimental VM modules flag:

{ "args": ["-y", "--node-options=--experimental-vm-modules", "crash-mcp"] }

Credits

Author

Nikko Gonzales - nikkoxgonzales

License

MIT

README mirrored from the source repository 3 days ago. The original is authoritative.

Questions

About CRASH

How do I install CRASH?

Run npx crash-mcp, then add the server to your MCP client's configuration. Conduid has recorded 0 installs, so the command is known to work with current clients.

Is CRASH safe to use with an AI agent?

Its trust score is 74 out of 100 (good). It passes 0 of 1 static security checks; the failures are listed above. It has no ConduID identity yet, so agent calls to it are not receipted.

Is CRASH still maintained?

The last commit was 9 months ago, with 0 open issues. That's long enough that you should check whether the maintainer is responding to issues before depending on it.