About Sales-Engineering/RFP-Response MCP
Sales-Engineering/RFP-Response MCP is an MCP server in the Science category: provides structured templates for security questionnaires, RFP responses, and competitive battlecards to help AI agents and sales engineers draft responses efficiently.
Install
git clone https://github.com/closermethod/sales-engineering-mcpThis server has no ConduID identity, so agent calls to it are not receipted. Pin the version you install and review the source before granting it credentials.
Tools (7)
get_competitive_battlecard3 competitive scenarios (vs legacy incumbent, vs modern competitor, vs DIY internal build)
Parameters not published.
get_full_packComplete library for fine-tuning or full agent context
Parameters not published.
get_questionnaire_response10 common security questionnaire questions with template responses (encryption, access control, vulnerability mgmt, IR, retention, sub-processors, residency, SLA, AI usage)
Parameters not published.
get_rfp_response_template7 common RFP sections (overview, architecture, integrations, pricing, SLA, competitive displacement, references)
Parameters not published.
get_security_attestationSOC2 / ISO27001 / HIPAA / GDPR / NIST CSF / PCI-DSS attestation templates with placeholders
Parameters not published.
list_all_topicsDiscovery — all available frameworks, topics, sections, scenarios
Parameters not published.
search_questionnaireFree-text search across all questionnaire topics
Parameters not published.
Ask AI
Ask AI about Sales-Engineering/RFP-Response MCP
Powered by Claude · Grounded in docs
Security checks
- ✓README presentThe repository ships documentation.
5 checks have not been run yet.
README
Sales-Engineering / RFP-Response MCP
Drop-in templates for security questionnaires (SOC2, ISO27001, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST CSF, PCI-DSS), RFP responses, and competitive battlecards. For AI sales agents and human sales engineers.
Built from 10+ years of B2B enterprise sales experience.
Disclaimer. Outputs are structured starting templates based on publicly-documented security frameworks. They are NOT (a) a substitute for the actual content of your security program, (b) legal advice, (c) a certified audit attestation, (d) a guarantee of compliance. Replace bracketed placeholders with your specific facts. Have qualified security and legal counsel review before submitting any actual RFP or questionnaire response.
Why This Exists
Mid-market B2B SaaS sales engineering teams burn 100-300 hours per quarter answering the same security and RFP questions. Loopio and Responsive sell point solutions for this at $30-100K/year per company.
AI agents can do this work better — but they need a structured library of starting templates to draft from. This MCP provides that library.
Use case: an AI agent receives a 200-question security questionnaire. It calls this MCP for each question, gets a starting template, fills in customer-specific facts, and submits a draft for human review.
7 Tools
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
get_security_attestation |
SOC2 / ISO27001 / HIPAA / GDPR / NIST CSF / PCI-DSS attestation templates with placeholders |
get_questionnaire_response |
10 common security questionnaire questions with template responses (encryption, access control, vulnerability mgmt, IR, retention, sub-processors, residency, SLA, AI usage) |
get_rfp_response_template |
7 common RFP sections (overview, architecture, integrations, pricing, SLA, competitive displacement, references) |
get_competitive_battlecard |
3 competitive scenarios (vs legacy incumbent, vs modern competitor, vs DIY internal build) |
search_questionnaire |
Free-text search across all questionnaire topics |
list_all_topics |
Discovery — all available frameworks, topics, sections, scenarios |
get_full_pack |
Complete library for fine-tuning or full agent context |
Sample Use
// Customer questionnaire asks: "What encryption do you use for data at rest?"
mcp.call("get_questionnaire_response", { topic: "encryption_at_rest" });
// Returns starting template with placeholders for KMS provider, rotation cadence
// RFP needs a competitive section vs Salesforce
mcp.call("get_competitive_battlecard", { scenario: "vs_legacy_incumbent" });
// Returns differentiation pattern, common objections + responses, pricing play
Pricing
- Apify Pay-Per-Event: $0.05 per tool call
- First 10 calls free per actor
Coverage
Security frameworks (6)
SOC 2 Type II · ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · HIPAA · GDPR · NIST CSF 2.0 · PCI DSS 4.0
Questionnaire topics (10)
Encryption at rest · Encryption in transit · Access control / least privilege · Vulnerability management · Incident response · Data retention · Sub-processors · Data residency · Uptime SLA · AI data usage policy
RFP sections (7)
Company overview · Technical architecture · Integrations · Pricing · SLA & support · Competitive displacement · References
Battlecards (3)
vs Legacy Incumbent · vs Modern Competitor · vs DIY Internal Build
Production Roadmap
- v1.1: Add SOC 1, FedRAMP, StateRAMP, IRAP (Australia), CSA STAR, BSI C5 (Germany)
- v1.2: Vertical-specific Q&A (FinTech: PCI deep-dive, Healthcare: HIPAA + HITRUST, EdTech: FERPA/COPPA)
- v1.3: Bring-your-own-evidence adapter — pull current attestations from Vanta/Drata via API
- v2.0: Smart RFP-response — given a full RFP doc, pre-draft the entire response
Built By
Elisabeth Hitz — 10+ years of B2B enterprise sales experience. Worked sales engineering and RFP responses across SaaS verticals.
License: MIT
README copy captured when this server was indexed; it may lag the repository. The original is authoritative.