1. Conduid
  2. Developer Tools
  3. Code Mode
MCP server · Developer Tools

Code Mode

MCP server: Code Mode

Unclaimed last commit 11 months ago devtools
44Fair

Scored 5 months ago · breakdown

About Code Mode

Code Mode is an MCP server published by hoangnb24 in the Developer Tools category: mCP server: Code Mode.

The repository has 23 stars and 6 forks, with the last commit 11 months ago. Six months or more without a commit doesn't mean the server is broken, but check the open issues before depending on it in production.

Install

From source
git clone https://github.com/hoangnb24/mcp-code-mode

This server has no ConduID identity, so agent calls to it are not receipted. Pin the version you install and review the source before granting it credentials.

Ask AI

✦

Ask AI about Code Mode

Powered by Claude · Grounded in docs

I know everything about Code Mode. Ask me about installation, configuration, usage, or troubleshooting.

Security checks

Static checks derived from the repository 7 days ago. Heuristics on the source, not an audit.

  • ✓README presentThe repository ships documentation.
  • !License declaredNo license file. Legally you have no right to use it in a product.
  • ✓Tests presentA test suite exists in the repository.
  • !Dependencies pinnedNo lockfile. Installs can pull different code over time.
  • !No dynamic code executionSource scan found eval or shell execution. Review how tool inputs reach it before granting credentials.
  • !Scoped permissionsDoesn't declare a permission scope. Assume it can do anything its process can.

README

MCP Code Mode

Prototype implementation for the Code Execution MCP Server with DSpy. The "Code Execution with MCP" architecture combines the strengths of Large Language Models at code generation with the Model Context Protocol for tool integration. This system enables an AI agent to write Python code that runs in an isolated sandbox while seamlessly calling external MCP tools.

Quick Start

1. Installation

Requires Python 3.11+ and Node.js 20+.

# Create virtual environment
python3.11 -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate

# Install dependencies
pip install -e .[dev]

# Install Node.js dependencies for reference servers
npm install -g npm@latest

2. Configuration

Copy the example environment file and configure secrets:

cp .env.example .env

Configure your MCP servers in mcp_servers.json:

{
  "servers": {
    "filesystem": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/your-working-folder"],
      "description": "Local file system operations"
    }
  }
}

3. Running the Server

Launch the Code Execution MCP server:

python -m mcp_code_mode.executor_server

4. Verification

Verify your setup by running the debug executor script. This script simulates an MCP client, connects to the server, and runs a test task to ensure the agent and tools are working correctly.

Before running the script:

  1. Configure the MCP servers you want to interact with in mcp_servers.json.
  2. Define the specific task you want the agent to perform by editing the task variable in scripts/debug_executor.py.
python scripts/debug_executor.py

Development Commands

Command Description
pytest Run all tests
ruff check . Lint the codebase
black . Format the codebase
mypy src Type check the source
python scripts/test_dspy_sandbox.py Sanity check the sandbox
python scripts/debug_executor.py Integration test with mock client

Execution Environment & Guardrails

By default, the system uses a Local Python Executor (LocalPythonExecutor) which runs code in the same process as the server. This is necessary because the strict Pyodide sandbox has limitations with network I/O, preventing it from calling back to other MCP tools in some environments.

Guardrails

Even with the local executor, the system enforces policies before code execution:

  • Limits: 8k characters / 400 lines max.
  • Imports: Allowlist only (json, math, re, datetime, etc.).
  • Tokens: Disallows potentially dangerous tokens (subprocess, exec, eval).

Violations return a POLICY_VIOLATION error.

Note: You can force the use of the Pyodide sandbox by setting MCP_EXECUTOR=pyodide, but this may break tool calls depending on your environment.

Architecture

Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   MCP Client (Claude, etc.)                  │
└────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
                         │ MCP Protocol (stdio/HTTP/SSE)
                         ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    FastMCP Server                            │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐  │
│  │  @mcp.tool                                           │  │
│  │  async def execute_code(code: str):                 │  │
│  │      # 1. Execute in Local Executor (default)       │  │
│  │      result = await executor.run(code)              │  │
│  │      return result                                   │  │
│  └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘  │
└────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
                         │
                         ▼
          ┌──────────────────────────────┐
          │    Execution Engine:         │
          │  • LocalPythonExecutor       │
          │    (or Pyodide Sandbox)      │
          └──────────────────────────────┘

Why Code Mode?

Traditional MCP implementations face critical challenges:

  1. Context Window Bloat: Every tool definition consumes tokens, limiting scalability.
  2. Token Cost: Multiple back-and-forth tool calls are expensive.
  3. Latency: Sequential tool invocations create cumulative delays.
  4. Composability: Complex workflows require many discrete steps.

Code Mode addresses these by leveraging what LLMs excel at: writing code. Rather than making multiple tool calls, the agent writes a Python script that orchestrates all necessary operations internally.

Core Components

  1. The Executor Server (FastMCP) (src/mcp_code_mode/executor_server.py) The server exposes an execute_code tool backed by a Python executor (Local or Pyodide). Uses fastmcp to handle the MCP protocol and dspy for execution logic.

  2. Configuration-Driven Discovery (mcp_servers.json) The system uses mcp_servers.json to explicitly configure which MCP servers to connect to. Loaded by src/mcp_code_mode/mcp_manager.py.

  3. Tool Schema Formatting (src/mcp_code_mode/tool_formatter.py) Formats discovered MCP tools into readable documentation that gets passed to the code generation LLM, so it knows what tools exist.

  4. Context Injection The formatted tool schemas are passed as an input field to the LLM. The LLM knows tool names, parameters, and usage examples before it writes the code.

Information Flow

1. mcp_servers.json (Defines servers)
   ↓
2. MCPServerManager.initialize()
   ├─ Connect to configured servers
   ├─ Call list_tools() on each
   └─ Convert to DSpy tools
   ↓
3. ToolSchemaFormatter.format_for_llm()
   └─ Creates readable documentation
   ↓
4. CodeExecutionAgent
   └─ Stores both callable tools and schemas
   ↓
5. Agent Generation
   └─ Passes tool_context to LLM
   ↓
6. Code Execution
   └─ Code runs in sandbox, calling actual tools via MCP

Troubleshooting

Timeout Issues: If the interpreter times out, it may enter a bad state. Currently, the best fix is to restart the server or reconnect the client to get a fresh interpreter instance.

Missing Tools: Ensure mcp_servers.json paths are correct and that you have run npm install if using Node-based servers.

References

mcp-code-mode

README fetched from the repository 7 days ago. The original is authoritative.

Questions

About Code Mode

How do I install Code Mode?

No package has been published for this server, so install it from source: clone the repository and follow its README.

Is Code Mode safe to use with an AI agent?

Its trust score is 44 out of 100 (fair). It passes 2 of the 6 static security checks run so far; the failures are listed above. It has no ConduID identity yet, so agent calls to it are not receipted.

Is Code Mode still maintained?

The last commit was 11 months ago and 1 open issues. That's long enough that you should check whether the maintainer is responding to issues before depending on it.