mcp-retrieval-spec

The jMRI (jMunch Retrieval Interface) specification — an open interface standard for token-efficient context retrieval in MCP servers.

---

What Is jMRI?

Agents that read whole files to answer specific questions waste 99% of their token budget. jMRI is a minimal interface for MCP servers that do retrieval right: index once, search by intent, retrieve exactly what you need.

Four operations. One response envelope. Two compliance levels.

The problem in numbers: A typical FastAPI codebase costs ~42,000 tokens to read naively. jMRI retrieval of the same answer costs ~480 tokens. At $3/1M tokens, that's $0.126 vs. $0.0014 per query. Across millions of queries, the savings are material.

The jMunch tools have saved billions of tokens across user sessions. This spec is the formal definition of what they do.

---

How It Works

Agent
  │
  ├─ discover()    → What knowledge sources are available?
  ├─ search(query) → Which symbols/sections are relevant? (IDs + summaries only)
  ├─ retrieve(id)  → Give me the exact source for this ID.
  └─ metadata(id?) → What would naive reading have cost?

Every response includes a _meta block with tokens_saved and total_tokens_saved. Agents can see exactly what they're saving on every call.

---

Spec

→ SPEC.md

The full jMRI v1.0 specification. Apache 2.0. Implement it however you want.

---

Reference Implementations

The spec is open. The best implementations are commercial.

Implementation	Domain	Stars	Install
jCodeMunch	Code (70+ languages)	1,500+	uvx jcodemunch-mcp
jDocMunch	Docs (MD, RST, HTML, notebooks)	135+	uvx jdocmunch-mcp
jDataMunch	Tabular data (CSV, Excel, Parquet, JSONL)	new	uvx jdatamunch-mcp

Both implement jMRI-Full. Licenses available at https://j.gravelle.us/jCodeMunch/

---

Quick Start

Using the Python SDK

from sdk.python.mri_client import MRIClient

client = MRIClient()  # connects to local jcodemunch-mcp

# List available repos
sources = client.discover()

# Search
results = client.search("database session dependency", repo="fastapi/fastapi")
for r in results:
    print(r["id"], r["summary"])

# Retrieve
symbol = client.retrieve(results[0]["id"], repo="fastapi/fastapi")
print(symbol["source"])
print(f"Tokens saved: {symbol['_meta']['tokens_saved']:,}")

Claude Code Integration

Add to your ~/.claude.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jcodemunch-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["jcodemunch-mcp"]
    },
    "jdocmunch-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["jdocmunch-mcp"]
    }
  }
}

See examples/claude-code/ for full setup.

Cursor Integration

See examples/cursor/.

---

Repo Structure

mcp-retrieval-spec/
├── SPEC.md                    # The jMRI specification (Apache 2.0)
├── CHANGELOG.md               # Spec version history
├── LICENSE                    # Spec: Apache 2.0. Reference impls: commercial.
├── reference/
│   ├── server.py              # Minimal jMRI-compliant server
│   └── config.example.json   # Sample configuration
├── sdk/
│   ├── python/mri_client.py  # Python client helper (Apache 2.0)
│   └── typescript/mri-client.ts
├── examples/
│   ├── claude-code/           # Claude Code integration
│   ├── cursor/                # Cursor integration
│   └── generic-agent/         # Minimal jMRI agent
└── benchmark/                 # munch-benchmark suite

---

Licensing

Component	License
SPEC.md	Apache 2.0 — implement freely
SDK clients	Apache 2.0 — use freely
Reference server	Requires jMunch license for commercial use
Benchmark suite	Apache 2.0

This is the Stripe model: the API spec is open and well-documented; the best implementation is commercial.

---

Benchmark

→ benchmark/

Clone and run in under 5 minutes. Compares Naive, Chunk RAG, and jMRI on FastAPI and Flask. Results are honest: if RAG beats jMRI on a metric, it's reported.

Real numbers on FastAPI (950K naive tokens):

Method	Avg Tokens	Cost/Query	Precision
Naive (read all files)	949,904	$2.85	100%
Chunk RAG	330,372	$0.99	74%
jMRI	480	$0.0014	96%

1,979x fewer tokens than naive. Higher precision than RAG.

---

Contributing

The spec is intentionally minimal. PRs that extend the core interface require strong justification. PRs that improve examples, fix errors, or add language-specific SDK clients are welcome.

Open an issue before proposing spec changes.