About Writing MCP
Writing MCP is an MCP server in the Developer Tools category: local, deterministic MCP server for writing agents. Indexes InkOS/Markdown/TXT/EPUB into a rebuildable SQLite/FTS5 index and answers with SHA-256-verifiable evidence excerpts under token budgets. No LLM inside, never writes back.
Install
claude mcp add writing-mcp -- npx -y @hanna84/mcp-writingnpx -y @hanna84/mcp-writingThis server has no ConduID identity, so agent calls to it are not receipted. Pin the version you install and review the source before granting it credentials.
Ask AI
Ask AI about Writing MCP
Powered by Claude · Grounded in docs
Security checks
- ✓README presentThe repository ships documentation.
5 checks have not been run yet.
README
mcp-writing
An MCP service for AI-assisted reasoning and editing on long-form fiction projects.
Designed to work with OpenClaw but compatible with any MCP-capable AI gateway.
Quick launch
For local stdio MCP clients, run the published package directly:
WRITING_SYNC_DIR=/path/to/sync-dir DB_PATH=./writing.db npx -y @hanna84/mcp-writing
The CLI wrapper defaults to stdio transport and adds the Node 22 SQLite flag automatically when needed.
VS Code extension
For VS Code-native setup flows (including prose styleguide setup), use:
What it does
Instead of feeding an entire manuscript to an AI and hoping it fits in the context window, mcp-writing builds a structured index from your scene files. The AI queries that index first — finding relevant characters, beats, and loglines — then loads only the specific prose it needs.
Current status:
- Core platform complete: Metadata-first analysis, sidecar-backed metadata maintenance, AI-assisted prose editing with confirmation + git history, review bundles, and Scrivener Direct extraction are all implemented.
- Recently delivered: Guideline generation is now delivered and tracked in done PRDs.
- Active development: OpenClaw integration is the current focus area.
- Deferred backlog: embeddings search is intentionally deferred for later exploration.
Who it is for
- Novelists and writing teams working on long manuscripts with many scenes, characters, and continuity constraints.
- AI-assisted editing workflows where you want targeted context retrieval instead of full-manuscript prompting.
- Projects that need traceable, reversible edits with metadata that stays synchronized as drafts evolve.
Documentation
| Guide | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/setup.md | Prerequisites, first-time setup, Scrivener import, native sync format |
| mcp-writing-vscode | VS Code extension for client-native setup flows |
| docs/docker.md | Docker Compose, OpenClaw integration, SSH hardening |
| docs/data-ownership.md | Which tools write which files, import safety rules |
| docs/tools.md | Full tool reference — auto-generated from source |
| docs/development.md | Running locally, tests, environment variables, troubleshooting |
Breaking changes
describe_workflows surface redesign
describe_workflows now exposes an outcome-first, discovery-first workflow map. This is a breaking change if your prompts or automation depend on previous workflow IDs or ordering.
Update integrations using this mapping:
manuscript_exploration->question_driven_discovery(ortargeted_scene_readingwhen the task is prose inspection)prose_editing->safe_scene_revisioncharacter_management->character_understandingplace_management->place_understandingreview_bundle->review_preparation
New workflow IDs added:
thread_understandingparity_recovery
Styleguide workflows are still available, but no longer positioned as part of the primary daily workflow surface.
find_scenes and get_arc response-shape standardization
find_scenes and get_arc now always return structured envelopes, including non-paginated calls.
- Envelope fields:
results,total_count. - Pagination fields are included when paging is active.
warning/next_stepare included when relevant.
If your integration previously handled raw arrays for non-paginated calls, update it to parse envelopes consistently.
Safe parsing pattern:
const parsed = JSON.parse(toolText);
const scenes = parsed.results ?? [];
const totalCount = parsed.total_count ?? scenes.length;
const warning = parsed.warning ?? null;
const nextStep = parsed.next_step ?? null;
Usage scenarios
1) Continuity pass before sending chapters to beta readers
Goal: catch inconsistencies before sharing pages.
- Run
syncafter your latest writing session. - Ask
find_scenesfor scenes involving a specific character or tag (for example, all scenes taggedinjuryorpromise). - Use
get_arcto review that character's ordered progression across the manuscript. - Load only the suspect scenes with
get_scene_prose. - Attach follow-up notes with
flag_scenewhere continuity needs a fix.
Outcome: you review one narrative thread at a time instead of rereading the entire novel to find contradictions.
2) Planning and tracking subplot beats during revisions
Goal: make sure subplot threads progress intentionally and resolve on time.
- Run
list_threadsfor the project. - Use
get_thread_arcto inspect scene order and beat labels for each thread. - When a beat is missing, call
upsert_thread_linkto add or update it on the right scene. - Re-run
get_thread_arcto confirm pacing and coverage.
Outcome: subplot structure stays visible and auditable, which reduces dropped threads in late drafts.
3) Tightening scene metadata after heavy prose edits
Goal: keep indexes accurate without manually re-tagging everything.
- After rewriting scenes, call
enrich_sceneto re-derive lightweight metadata from current prose. - Use
update_scene_metadatafor intentional editorial fields (for example, beat, POV, timeline position, and tags). - Use
search_metadataandfind_scenesto verify scenes are discoverable under the expected filters.
Outcome: your AI assistant can reliably find the right scenes without drifting from the manuscript.
4) Safe AI-assisted line edits with rollback
Goal: let AI propose prose edits without losing control of your draft.
- Ask the AI to call
propose_editfor a specific scene. - Review the staged diff.
- Accept with
commit_editor reject withdiscard_edit. - Use
list_snapshots(and optionalsnapshot_scene) to inspect or preserve revision history.
Outcome: you get AI speed with explicit approval and recoverable history for every applied change.
5) Refreshing scene-character links after imports or major rewrites
Goal: rebuild scene-to-character links in a controlled way after imported prose changes or metadata drift.
- Start with
enrich_scene_characters_batchusing the defaultdry_run=trueto preview inferred links for a project, chapter, or explicit scene list. - Poll
get_async_job_statusuntil the batch job completes, then reviewjob.result.resultsfor changed scenes, ambiguous matches, and partial failures. - Spot-check a few affected scenes with
get_scene_proseif the changes touch important continuity or cast-heavy chapters. - Re-run
enrich_scene_characters_batchwithdry_run=falseonce the preview looks correct. - If you want a destructive overwrite instead of additive merge behavior, use
replace_mode=replacewithconfirm_replace=truedeliberately.
Outcome: character-link maintenance becomes a preview-first batch operation instead of a one-off regex script or manual sidecar cleanup.
6) Post-upgrade recovery after legacy migration warnings
Goal: recover index confidence quickly when legacy upgrade warnings indicate ambiguous rows were skipped.
- Start by checking
get_runtime_config(ordescribe_workflows) and confirm whetherdb_migration_warningscontainsLEGACY_JOIN_ROWS_SKIPPED. - If present, run
syncimmediately to rebuild scene relationships from current sidecars and prose metadata. - Continue normal discovery (
find_scenes,get_arc,get_thread_arc) and watch for stale-metadata warnings. - When you touch stale scenes, run
enrich_scene(scene_id, project_id)to recover metadata parity incrementally. - If many scenes remain stale, switch to
enrich_scene_characters_batch(dry-run first) for broader catch-up.
Outcome: upgrade-related data loss risk becomes an explicit, operator-visible recovery workflow instead of a silent state mismatch.
License
AGPL-3.0-only
README copy captured when this server was indexed; it may lag the repository. The original is authoritative.